At the bottom of this post is a link to comments. Please ask them there and I will answer them during the review session time on Wednesday.
Thanks!


How about the active vs. restraint model?

Active: Be a bit more flexible, read between the lines, change policy from bench
http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-gideon-v-wainwright
o Roe v. Wade
http://www.lawnix.com/cases/roe-wade.html
o Griswold v. Connecticut
http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/family-law/family-law-keyed-to-weisberg/private-family-choices-constitutional-protection-for-the-family-and-its-members/griswold-v-connecticut-2/
o Schenck v. New York
http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/constitutional-law/constitutional-law-keyed-to-sullivan/freedom-of-speech-why-government-restricts-speech-unprotected-and-less-protected-expression/schenck-v-united-states-3/
o Miranda v. Arizona
http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-israel/police-interrogation-and-confessions/miranda-v-arizona-2/
o Gregg v. Georgia
http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/criminal-law/criminal-law-keyed-to-lafave/homicide-using-mental-state-and-other-factors-to-classify-crimes/gregg-v-georgia-3/
Also a little about reasonable and strict scrutiny
http://blogs.findlaw.com/law_and_life/2014/01/challenging-laws-3-levels-of-scrutiny-explained.html